News Akagera National Park Aerial Census 2015

In August this year, Akagera Management Company conducted the third aerial census of the park since their management of Akagera, following the 2010 and the 2013 surveys. The following provides a summary and extracts from the report produced by Dereck MacPhereson.

Concerned URL http://www.africanparks.eu/Blog_195_Akagera+National+Park+Aerial+Census+August+2015.html
Source African Parks
Release date 26/11/2015
Contributor Richard NIYOMUGABO
Geographical coverage Rwanda
Keywords Akagera National Park, aerial census,

Total area counting methodology was used to count large herbivores resident in the survey area comprising the terrestrial part of Akagera National Park and the fringes of the wetlands associated with the Akagera River and system of lakes. A total of 12,275 animals were counted, an increase from 7,892 in 2013.

Ninety elephant, 2,567 buffalo, 79 giraffe, 219 eland, 108 Roan, 1,384 waterbuck, 1,827 Zebra, 805 Topi, 2,144 impala, 1,067 warthog and 1,565 hippopotami were counted during this survey. These population estimates are considered to be accurate enough to be meaningful to wildlife management decision-making processes. Other species participating in the survey were considered to be significantly undercounted due to being cryptic and secretive in nature.

Wildlife populations for many species are showing increasing trends most notably buffalo, waterbuck, zebra, topi and warthog. The population of roan antelope, a specie, considered by Lamprey in 2002 to be vulnerable to extirpation in this area, is recovering well. Numbers of eland are also increasing steadily.

The survey was conducted using a R44 helicopter flying along east-west transects of the park with an average flight path spacing of 600 metres, beginning in the south and working up to the north. A total of 27.9 hours of flying time over four days was needed to complete the survey. The team consisted of: the Pilot, Celestine Kazungu; Derek McPhereson, the FSO (front seat observer) and data recorder noting down each sighting and giving a GPS coordinate, and then compiling the written report; Jes Gruner, the park manager and Eugene Mutangana, head of law enforcement, as the two RSO’s (rear seat observer).

The 2013 census employed a variable flight path spacing as dictated by the nature of the vegetation and its impact on visibility. This slight difference in methodology caused the survey area to be more thoroughly searched in 2015 than in 2013. The result is that part of the recorded increase in wildlife population numbers for this period can be attributed to this improvement of search intensity.

While previous aerial surveys have been conducted, the methods used to conduct these surveys differed; 1968 & 1969 (Guinness & Spinage); 1990 (Vande weghe & Dejace); 1997 & 1998 (Williams & Ntayombya); 2002 (Lamprey) and in 2010 by Viljoen, the first when Akagera was under the management of AMC. Furthermore, the area of land that has made up the Akagera National Park and the adjacent Mutara Domaine de Chasse (hunting area) has been reduced in size over time. Different surveys have, therefore, covered different total areas. Consequently, comparison of the results of the different censuses is difficult and speculative. Therefore, while wildlife population trend analysis for the current, reduced park area, is possible for period 1997 / 1998 through to the present such comparison should be treated with extreme caution.

Notwithstanding these limiting factors, trend analysis remains useful when focused on those species that are tendered by the various authors as having the most accurate estimates. Relating wildlife population trends to historic events promoting human advance on the Protected Area and differing levels of wildlife management input in ANP reveals a definite correlation between the ebb and flow of these two major forces and wildlife populations.

The 2013 and 2015 surveys provide the most reliable comparison because very similar survey methodology was used. Close adherence to maintaining the method will produce reliable comparisons going forward. 

 

Please note that this information has expired.